Monday, December 3, 2012

Nuclear Option 121203


It’s Time for the Nuclear Option

            America’s national debt reached $16,000,000,000,000 about three months ago.  That milestone just happened to coincide with the opening day of the Democratic National Convention.  We have added another $300,000,000,000 plus since the balloons were released in Charlotte.  We are approaching the point at which our debt as a percentage of GDP might take us down.  We are in a fiscal death spiral.  It is impossible to know exactly when economic Armageddon is coming.  But make no mistake about it; if we continue to spend at our current rate, it is coming.

            Against this backdrop, Democrats and Republicans are pretending to deal with the pretend crisis that we pretend to be a “fiscal cliff.”  I say it is a pretend crisis because it pales in comparison to the real crisis that consists of serial trillion dollar deficits, ballooning national debt, and uncontrolled spending.  President Obama and Congressional Democrats continue to make the ridiculous argument that “taxing the rich” is the be-all-end-all path to fiscal responsibility and economic prosperity.  Best estimates are that the Obama tax plan would generate about $82 billion annually to help us address our $1.1 trillion deficit problem.  To put it in dollar terms we relate to, it is the equivalent of adding a part time job that pays $8,200 per year in a household that spends $110,000 more each year that it takes in!  Not exactly a fix.  Let’s face it; taxing the rich is about envy and wealth redistribution.  No serious person believes this is the solution to our deficit and debt problems.

            Republicans are behaving only slightly better.  Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have a history of talking tough on spending reductions, but when it comes to performance, not so much.  The 2011 debt ceiling “negotiation” ended with an increased debt ceiling and some reductions in the rate of growth in spending.  However, once the ink dried on the agreement, almost all of these “cuts” proved illusory.

During the current negotiation process, Boehner and McConnell have held to their promise not to raise tax rates, but have intimated a willingness to eliminate certain tax deductions and credits.  This would allow Republicans to compromise with Democrats by raising revenue, but still hold the line on marginal tax rates, thereby remaining on Grover Norquist’s cocktail party invitation list.  But the Republicans have not put forward a serious entitlement reform proposal or stated specific spending cuts they would recommend.  They have not articulated the big picture well enough to help people comprehend the magnitude of the debt monster we face.

It is obvious to me that working through the usual institutional channels will not result in a reasonable resolution of our fiscal crisis.  In the absence of radical action, America is going down economically.

But the Republican controlled house does have one trump card: the debt ceiling.  Congress sets a debt ceiling, above which the federal government is not allowed to borrow.  We are on the precipice of hitting the current debt ceiling of $16,400,000,000,000.  What should the Republican House do?  Stop the madness.  Cut it off.  Don’t raise the debt ceiling.  Force lawmakers, the executive branch and the bureaucrats to stop deficit spending.  Just like that.  Make the addict go cold turkey, and hope withdrawal doesn’t kill him.

Yes I know, this is intemperate and will cause all kinds of anxiety and unintended consequences.  I am generally not a radical reactionary.  I believe in institutions and decorum and compromise and all that stuff.  After all, I voted for the bloated budget passed by the Minnesota Legislature during the 2011 legislative special session because it was the only viable option, given our Governor’s intransigence.  It is not my nature to upset systems that have been in place for decades or centuries.  However, I don’t see any viable path to fiscal sanity so long as Congress and the President have the authority to borrow money.  Words cannot adequately describe the degree to which Washington lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, have engaged in dereliction of duty on the issue of spending.

It is clear to me we have very few statesmen in Congress, weak leadership in both legislative bodies, and a President who either doesn’t know or doesn’t care that he is the captain of a ship headed for an iceberg.  I know the medication I prescribe comes with horrible side effects.  But it appears to me it is the only chance the patient has to survive.

7 comments:

  1. Senator, what do you think about just letting them have it all?

    The GOP is over a barrel and I don't believe they'll have the guts to stick to their guns. Therefore whatever tiny little concession they can get from the Democrats: #1: Will not help the situation that much, #2 Will be blamed in full for the terrible state of the economy moving forward.

    The American people were dumb enough to re-elect this guy, let it fall at his feet and let's buckle up and face the consequences. Otherwise the Dems and media will blame the tiny bit of GOP action as the reason for our despair and we will be in no better position come 2016.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. KingsMama, I think what you say makes a lot of sense politically. My concern is that the results of letting it all blow up may be irreversible. Or it may take decades to recover. Significant economic turmoil can destabilize a political system and lead to all kinds of bad things. Allowing our economic system to collapse is very risky.

      Delete
    2. I'm far to the left of Obama, and I echo your concern but from the opposing direction.

      Politics and soundbites aside, I dont think anyone can dispute that Govt spending has been used to prop up GDP since the dot com crash. If you tweak that off too abruptly or at the wrong economic cycle, you shrink GDP, and thus shrink revenue which then forces more cuts, and if such is left unchecked, it too could blow up and be irreversible.

      Debt needs to be managed, as does spending as do revenue increases in a responsible way. Medicare part D and the inability for feds to negotiating pricing should have been paid for with increased taxes to cover it or it should not have been enacted. The wars in the middle east should have been paid for with taxes to cover them, or we should not have engaged in them.

      On a state level... if you guys get some wild idea to add more spending (case in point, Voter ID), then raise state taxes to pay for it, or be honest upfront and say... This legislation is important, but its not important enough to raise state taxes to pay for it. This business of cost shifting to local govt and/or the feds in some cases is still a tax increase.



      Delete
  2. Bravo! Any fool knows that the first thing you do when you get in debt trouble is to cut up the credit cards, and the second thing you do, and quick, is to figure out what you can do without so as to live without overspending.

    It doesn't matter what Republicans do here, they are going to get blamed if they do and blamed if they don't. They will get blamed if they don't give the Dems everything they want, and they'll get blamed for the horrible economy if they do, so they may as well do the right and sensible thing and tough it out. The only "middle ground" is to hold the debt ceiling hostage until a "deficit elimination budget" passes the Dem-controlled US Senate. That sort of "you first" and "put your money where your mouth is" stance might make political purse from sow's ear.

    J. Ewing

    ReplyDelete
  3. "a President who either doesn’t know or doesn’t care that he is the captain of a ship headed for an iceberg."

    Oh, he knows alright. Not only does he not care, he's fighting against almost half of the steering house crew to keep the ship *pointed directly at the iceberg*. It is intentional.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with the Senator. The ship of state is heading straight for the iceberg and we need to do whatever it takes to turn the wheel. We are out of options.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Allowing our economic system to collapse is very risky." Yes, absolutely. It's just probably out of frustration that I asked the question above. I am seeing very little (including from many GOP leaders) that would raise my hopes of getting out of this fiscal mess. Until the electorate gets better informed, they will continue to vote for the false promises and dangerous policies of those trying to move us towards a utopian dreamworld and away from our founding principles.

    In any case, thank you, Sen. Thompson, for continuing to be a very strong and well spoken voice of reason.

    ReplyDelete